The editorial activity of the project is based on principles of professional responsibility, analytical independence, and methodological clarity. The project treats information as an object of analysis, not as an instrument of influence or mobilization.
Separation of Facts and Analysis
The editorial policy strictly distinguishes between:
- factual reporting of events,
- analytical interpretation,
- expert assessments and scenario-based assumptions.
Readers are able to clearly differentiate between facts, analysis, and conclusions, regardless of the content format.
Expert Autonomy of Departments
Each department operates with analytical autonomy within its defined domain of expertise. Content is produced on the basis of specialized knowledge, professional judgment, and domain-specific analytical logic.
Editorial coordination ensures unified standards of quality and responsibility without interfering in expert conclusions.
Use of Analytical Models
Analytical indices and models are used exclusively as supporting tools for analysis and visualization.
They do not define editorial positions, do not replace expert judgment, and are not used for automated decision-making.
Verification and Updates
The editorial team follows the principle of correctability. Materials may be updated, clarified, or expanded as new data, confirmations, or corrections become available.
Factual accuracy and contextual integrity are treated as priorities.
Work with Sources
The project relies on open and publicly available sources.
When data is contradictory, discrepancies are explicitly acknowledged, and definitive conclusions are avoided in the absence of sufficient verification.
Limits of Automation
Automated tools are used for data processing, structuring, and analysis, but not for independent content creation.
Final decisions regarding publication, framing, and context are made by the editorial team.
Independence and Neutrality
The project does not serve political, commercial, or other external interests.
Editorial positions are formed through analysis and expertise rather than predefined narratives or situational considerations.
Responsibility to the Audience
The audience is regarded as professional and critically minded.
The goal of the project is to facilitate understanding of processes, not to provoke emotional responses or impose ready-made judgments.